Social, demography and democracy | proKapitalizm - Portal supporters of freedom
Post on Journalism Adam Adam Karpinski Kalicki Damian Kot Damian Kubiak Other John Malek Janusz Korwin-Mikke Wave Rafal Ziemkiewicz Matthew Robert Gwiazdowski Robert 2011 uk census Sirico Stanislaw Michalkiewicz Vaclav Klaus Jacob Lukasik 2011 uk census Jacek Wisniewski Bożydar John Jacob Żaboklicki Bodakowski John came Jerzy Karol Kisel Wasiukiewicz Kamil Janowski Gajewy Matthew Martin Teska Michael Bednarski Michael Nawrocki Natalia Dueholm Paul Budrewicz Paul Sztąberek Toboła-Pertkiewicz Paul Raymond Pollak Wojciech Wojciech Popiel Łukasz Czarnecki Stefaniak Country Political parties Politics Polish Foreign Policy Europe Albania Austria Belarus Belgium Bulgaria Cyprus Czech Republic Denmark France Germany Greece Iceland Ireland Luxembourg Netherlands Norway Portugal Russia Germany Romania Slovakia Slovenia Spain Sweden Switzerland Ukraine United Kingdom Hungary Ireland 2011 uk census Italy Latvia World Africa 2011 uk census South America Central Asia Middle East USA Poland economics of Adam Smith Centre for Classics Ludwig von Mises Lecture PAFERE Interview Society History Culture Cuisine Customs Wine and Beverage Book Excerpts Full Faith Issue Media Reviews Previews Audio Video Debate Competition
Rejecting the private ownership of the means of production, and thereby raise capital to produce these, performance socialism depends entirely on demographics, those who are "social property" fund through their work. Not otherwise is the case socjalu, functioning under the Polish constitution enshrined in the "social market economy". Awareness of this relationship apparently 2011 uk census also reached the Polish politicians. And as is the case sometimes brutal 2011 uk census socialist reality "aging society", that is, smaller revenues and increased spending socjalu, is an opportunity to raise levies.
You have to admit, that in this case the politicians behave very consistently completing the wish, expressed by the vox populi in democratic elections. Since the working people of the towns and villages in the state of care demands, it has to get it, so that he can get it, he must finance and so on. Of course, that no politician can not simply say, in a democracy would be finished. Even so, even with what they say justify further tax ideas, it is clear that social is not free and it is only in the immediate przeżeraniu collected funds. Top under the banner of "social solidarity" and "social justice."
Here there are ideas to introduce "premium 2011 uk census care" which will be financed care for dependents (through "vouchers" - why did not you "cards"?) And the tax on childlessness (see Witaszczyk recommend a comment.) In both cases, the reasons are: demographics, declining revenues and increasing expenses socjalu. The argument is as follows: social "does sides", as currently raises less and less children, the pension goes post-war baby boom, more and more elderly people require expensive 2011 uk census care, and empty hand, so you have to impose new taxes. 2011 uk census And the children of others will be childless provide pensions, medical care, so "We can not have that in a society that rewards the bimbających and thinking only about his comfort, apartments, cars and holidays", thunders Mr Mieczysław 2011 uk census Kasprzak (PSL).
According to the principles of propaganda politicians never tell the whole story. And it is not the so-called protests likely. gay communities in the tax on childlessness (Criterion release is not going to orientation) and supporters of abortion on demand. Total silence overlooked is a significant detail - welfare recipients are people who have contributed! Even those selfish hedonists "thinking only of his comfort, apartments, cars and holidays." That's the first thing. Secondly - children actually 2011 uk census born less. But who is about to give birth, since in the absence of prospects for young people, age and reproductive, emigrate to the power and do not think to go back to toil for a pittance? Incidentally, apart from the issue of avoiding answering questions about the reasons for this state of affairs, which is not surprising, since it is the business 2011 uk census of politicians should be mentioned as the main source.
Banal idea that each alone, without the mediation of the state, take care of your retirement, health insurance, etc. somehow does not fit in the minds of politicians. Do take note that in such a system, raising and educating children is the best social security, and thus - an important investment in its future. The heads are not visible to the naked eye is a chronic failure of the system, resulting from the principles of its operation.
Dear author welfare can easily realize the state. So its citizens. There is no money? I'm sorry,
Post on Journalism Adam Adam Karpinski Kalicki Damian Kot Damian Kubiak Other John Malek Janusz Korwin-Mikke Wave Rafal Ziemkiewicz Matthew Robert Gwiazdowski Robert 2011 uk census Sirico Stanislaw Michalkiewicz Vaclav Klaus Jacob Lukasik 2011 uk census Jacek Wisniewski Bożydar John Jacob Żaboklicki Bodakowski John came Jerzy Karol Kisel Wasiukiewicz Kamil Janowski Gajewy Matthew Martin Teska Michael Bednarski Michael Nawrocki Natalia Dueholm Paul Budrewicz Paul Sztąberek Toboła-Pertkiewicz Paul Raymond Pollak Wojciech Wojciech Popiel Łukasz Czarnecki Stefaniak Country Political parties Politics Polish Foreign Policy Europe Albania Austria Belarus Belgium Bulgaria Cyprus Czech Republic Denmark France Germany Greece Iceland Ireland Luxembourg Netherlands Norway Portugal Russia Germany Romania Slovakia Slovenia Spain Sweden Switzerland Ukraine United Kingdom Hungary Ireland 2011 uk census Italy Latvia World Africa 2011 uk census South America Central Asia Middle East USA Poland economics of Adam Smith Centre for Classics Ludwig von Mises Lecture PAFERE Interview Society History Culture Cuisine Customs Wine and Beverage Book Excerpts Full Faith Issue Media Reviews Previews Audio Video Debate Competition
Rejecting the private ownership of the means of production, and thereby raise capital to produce these, performance socialism depends entirely on demographics, those who are "social property" fund through their work. Not otherwise is the case socjalu, functioning under the Polish constitution enshrined in the "social market economy". Awareness of this relationship apparently 2011 uk census also reached the Polish politicians. And as is the case sometimes brutal 2011 uk census socialist reality "aging society", that is, smaller revenues and increased spending socjalu, is an opportunity to raise levies.
You have to admit, that in this case the politicians behave very consistently completing the wish, expressed by the vox populi in democratic elections. Since the working people of the towns and villages in the state of care demands, it has to get it, so that he can get it, he must finance and so on. Of course, that no politician can not simply say, in a democracy would be finished. Even so, even with what they say justify further tax ideas, it is clear that social is not free and it is only in the immediate przeżeraniu collected funds. Top under the banner of "social solidarity" and "social justice."
Here there are ideas to introduce "premium 2011 uk census care" which will be financed care for dependents (through "vouchers" - why did not you "cards"?) And the tax on childlessness (see Witaszczyk recommend a comment.) In both cases, the reasons are: demographics, declining revenues and increasing expenses socjalu. The argument is as follows: social "does sides", as currently raises less and less children, the pension goes post-war baby boom, more and more elderly people require expensive 2011 uk census care, and empty hand, so you have to impose new taxes. 2011 uk census And the children of others will be childless provide pensions, medical care, so "We can not have that in a society that rewards the bimbających and thinking only about his comfort, apartments, cars and holidays", thunders Mr Mieczysław 2011 uk census Kasprzak (PSL).
According to the principles of propaganda politicians never tell the whole story. And it is not the so-called protests likely. gay communities in the tax on childlessness (Criterion release is not going to orientation) and supporters of abortion on demand. Total silence overlooked is a significant detail - welfare recipients are people who have contributed! Even those selfish hedonists "thinking only of his comfort, apartments, cars and holidays." That's the first thing. Secondly - children actually 2011 uk census born less. But who is about to give birth, since in the absence of prospects for young people, age and reproductive, emigrate to the power and do not think to go back to toil for a pittance? Incidentally, apart from the issue of avoiding answering questions about the reasons for this state of affairs, which is not surprising, since it is the business 2011 uk census of politicians should be mentioned as the main source.
Banal idea that each alone, without the mediation of the state, take care of your retirement, health insurance, etc. somehow does not fit in the minds of politicians. Do take note that in such a system, raising and educating children is the best social security, and thus - an important investment in its future. The heads are not visible to the naked eye is a chronic failure of the system, resulting from the principles of its operation.
Dear author welfare can easily realize the state. So its citizens. There is no money? I'm sorry,
